The PCSA Targeting Memo:
Data & Methods

Every senator, every documented conference position, every threshold I chose — the full apparatus behind the consulting memo nobody commissioned.

Kyle L. Saunders · June 2026 · Companion to the Sacred Cow BBQ essay · Data current as of June 10, 2026

Read the essay Download the spreadsheet

The figures

Right-click any figure to save it; the spreadsheet behind all of them is in the downloads below. Color logic throughout: blue Democratic caucus, red Republican, gray = documented SEC/Big Ten opposition money, pale fills = the weaker documented-support tier, white diamonds = net pressure.

Every U.S. senator, support and opposition athletics money shown separately, both parties
Where the PCSA votes actually live. Every senator, sorted by net documented home-state conference pressure; support and opposition shown separately because netting hides the fights. Download PNG
Scatterplot of DW-NOMINATE ideology versus net home-state conference pressure
The consultant's scatter. Ideology (Voteview DW-NOMINATE) against home-state money. Outlined dots are the bill's sponsors; rings mark Senate Commerce members; the × marks senators publicly committed against for reasons the money doesn't measure, and the key warns where more of those are likely hiding. Download PNG
Table of every faction with a stake in the PCSA, their price, and conflicts
The markup price list. Every faction, what each one wants, and which purchases are mutually exclusive. Download PNG
Senate Commerce Committee members with inline pressure bars and what to watch for each
The markup watch list. All 28 Commerce members plus the off-committee names the floor fight runs through, each with PVI, ideology, labeled net-pressure bars, and the signal they carry. Note how safe most of these seats are: the election-year risk is the caucus frame, not anyone's own race. Download PNG
The 53 Republicans, standalone version
The PCSA map: 53 Republicans (the party-by-party cut, as appended to the essay). Download PNG
The 47 Democratic caucus members, standalone version
The PCSA map: 47 Democrats (the party-by-party cut, as appended to the essay). Download PNG
G5 and non-power programs by athletics revenue against the $80M Lujan coach-pay threshold
The $80 million line. A later addition, from the post-markup essay: the bill's coach-pay cap (Sen. Luján's amendment) bites departments over $80M in revenue—the climbing tier, not the giants. FY2024-25 figures from the athletics-finance map; ghost bars show an illustrative +10% one-year projection. Download PNG

Downloads

Athletics revenue and conference affiliation come from the athletics finance map (The Whole D1 tab; institutions v6.3, with thanks to Dr. Greg Chick), and reflect the last completed reporting year. Positions are as of June 10, 2026; the July 2026 realignment is not reflected. That's the trade you make when you insist on receipts.

Methods, briefly

The evidence tiers

TierWhat countsWho's in it
T1 SUPPORTFormal post-introduction letters to Senate Commerce; institutional letters trump conference positionsACC (5/31), Big 12 (5/31), American (6/3), Sun Belt (6/9); institutional: Nebraska (5/27), UTEP (6/2), LSU (6/1, over its own conference's objection)
T2 SUPPORTThe May 15 letter signed by 26 of 32 D1 commissioners (pre-text, hence the weaker tier) and documented testimonyMWC, MAC, CUSA; Pac-12 (Gould testimony, 6/3)
OPPOSEJoint statement, oppose as written (6/2)SEC, Big Ten

Vibes don't score. Conference-office positions are imputed to member schools' revenue, with the caveat the essay names: offices aren't schools, and LSU proves it.

Senator-level variables

Robustness

Built on athletics money, checked against whole-institution revenues: the two only correlate moderately at the school level (r = 0.59; hospital systems), but the senator-level nets correlate at r = 0.89 and agree on the support-or-oppose sign in every state except net-zero Kentucky. The map is robust to that choice. Senator roster verified against the three 119th-Congress vacancies (OH, FL, OK, all filled by appointment).

The public grading sheet

The memo gets graded against reality. These are the falsifiable predictions on file as of June 10, 2026; this table gets updated, not rewritten, after markup. Markup results are filled in below (June 18, 2026); the floor-stage calls remain open. Through markup, the sheet stands at four hits, two misses, and three calls still open.

#PredictionConfidenceCheck atResult
1PCSA is reported out of CommerceHighMarkupHit — 19-9 (June 18)
2No more than 2 of the five watch-list Commerce Democrats (Markey, Rosen, Luján, Hickenlooper, pool-adjacent Schatz) vote aye in committeeMediumMarkupMiss — 4 of 5 voted aye (Rosen, Luján, Hickenlooper, Schatz); only Markey no. A miss on the count, off by two: the named targets were exactly right, the pool just moved more than predicted.
3At least one tail Republican on Commerce (Blackburn, Young, Wicker) offers or cosponsors an SEC-aligned amendmentMedium-HighMarkupHit — Wicker filed SEC-aligned amendments (85% pooling threshold; non-participant liability shield). They were not adopted; his adopted Wicker 2 is a separate CSC-enforcement safe harbor. Wicker and Young, the two tail Republicans the memo flagged, were the only GOP no votes.
4NCAA ask #7 (narrowed private right of action / exclusive federal jurisdiction) is offered as an amendmentMediumMarkupMiss — never offered.
5The media-pooling provision survives markup substantially intactMediumMarkupHit — survived; reported to the floor intact.
6Paul publicly opposes, demands a sunset, or files a sunset amendment before any floor voteMedium-HighFloor
7None of the 18 pool Democrats publicly endorses before markupHighMarkupHit — none endorsed pre-markup; the pool revealed itself at the committee vote.
8No standalone Senate floor passage before the August recessMediumAug 2026
9If enacted in 2026 at all, via attachment to a must-pass vehicle rather than standalone passageLow-MediumDec 2026