[
 {
  "doc_id": "cornell-university-2023-11ccd3",
  "institution": "Cornell University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "The Center for Teaching Innovation is available to consult with departments and individual faculty on how to best implement these recommendations.",
  "page": "p.10, Section 4, Recommendations for faculty and administration",
  "reason": "Implementation routed to the existing Center for Teaching Innovation and to 'the university administration, in consultation with faculty and academic staff'; nothing new proposed and nothing refused."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "cornell-university-2023-7eb22f",
  "institution": "Cornell University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Consider periodic updates to Cornell guidance, through a task force or other appropriate mechanisms, given the rapidly changing landscape of generative AI tools, uses, and considerations in academic research",
  "page": "p.21, Recommendations for the university (bulleted list)",
  "reason": "Routes continuing guidance to 'relevant central offices' and to a possible future task force 'or other appropriate mechanisms'; hedged and unowned, but no refusal anywhere in the document."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "louisiana-state-university-2025-f09899",
  "institution": "Louisiana State University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "For full syllabi samples tailored to your college, contact the Office of Academic Affairs or your college's curriculum coordinator.",
  "page": "p.12, Instructor Guidance",
  "reason": "Support and enforcement routed to existing units (Office of Academic Affairs, college curriculum coordinators, Student Advocacy & Accountability); no continuing structure proposed or refused."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "san-diego-state-university-2023-d89833",
  "institution": "San Diego State University",
  "verdict": "silent",
  "passage": null,
  "page": null,
  "searched_for_and_not_found": "committee, council, office, board, hub, center, standing, ongoing, permanent, oversight, governance, steering, successor, sunset, disband, charge concluded. 'Senate IIT Committee' appears only as the running header naming the authoring body; 'IT Security Office' appears once as an address for reporting suspicious activity. No passage addresses whether any structure continues.",
  "reason": "A four-level student-facing classification guide with no governance content at all."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "stanford-university-2025-341010",
  "institution": "Stanford University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Appropriate groups (indicated where possible) may wish to evaluate the need for, and content of, additional policies related to the use of AI in conducting Stanford activities.",
  "page": "p.4, Policy Areas",
  "reason": "Every recommendation is tagged in parentheses to an existing owner (Faculty Senate committees, Privacy Office, SDOC, Board on Conduct Affairs, CTL, Dean of Research); no new machinery is proposed and none is refused."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-at-buffalo-suny-2024-2bd6d8",
  "institution": "University at Buffalo (SUNY)",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Consultation with and guidance from the Office of Academic Integrity should be included in these deliberations.",
  "page": "p.5, Recommendations, item 7",
  "reason": "Work routed to existing units (Office of Academic Integrity, Teach Anywhere, CATT) and to departments; borderline flag - recommendation 2 says the University 'should consider building on the work of CATT and establishing a Digital Commons,' but that is a hedged proposal for a location to share practices, not a body with a charge."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-california-berkele-2025-c37ba1",
  "institution": "University of California, Berkeley",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Divisional Senates will determine what recommendations to adopt in the area of instruction and will work with the administration on their implementation.",
  "page": "p.1 (pdf_1), introductory memo",
  "reason": "Continuing work handed to the systemwide Academic Senate AI Workgroup, the Divisional Senate, and the Center for Teaching and Learning; no campus body proposed and none declined."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-california-los-ang-2023-49eceb",
  "institution": "University of California, Los Angeles",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "direct your attention to campus guidance compiled collaboratively by CEILS, CAT, OTL, and the Bruin Learn Center of Excellence, and other campus partners",
  "page": "HTML letter, opening paragraph (Dear Colleagues)",
  "reason": "A council-chairs letter that points faculty at existing teaching-support units and says further events 'are currently in the planning stages'; no new structure and no refusal."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-california-santa-c-2026-9471c5",
  "institution": "University of California, Santa Cruz",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Our recommendation is that the UCSC Office of Research (OR) consider creating more detailed and consolidated guidance on the use of AI in writing grant proposals",
  "page": "p.5, Writing Grant Proposals",
  "reason": "Every recommendation is addressed to an existing office (Office of Research, University Advancement, the ACER Committee, departments); the new AI steering committee it names is a systemwide UC body the campus joins, not something this report proposes."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-colorado-denver-2025-ebac8d",
  "institution": "University of Colorado Denver",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Technical support for AI tools will be integrated into existing university support systems established under Policy 5001 (Acceptable Use of Information Technology Resources).",
  "page": "Section 5.3, Technical Support (unpaginated)",
  "reason": "The 'established policy ecosystem' sentence is about not duplicating POLICIES, not about declining a body; the framework assigns continuing work to OIT, the Center for Faculty Development and the Office of Digital Education. Not a decision against a standing body."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-pennsylvania-2025-80a671",
  "institution": "University of Pennsylvania",
  "verdict": "silent",
  "passage": null,
  "page": null,
  "searched_for_and_not_found": "committee, council, office, board, hub, center, standing, ongoing, permanent, oversight, governance, steering, successor, sunset, disband, charge concluded. The Penn AI Council and the SAS AI Working Group appear once in the Introduction as scene-setting; 'hubs' and 'centers' on p.6 refer to proposed AI-free physical study spaces. No passage addresses continuing machinery.",
  "reason": "A faculty working-group position paper whose three asks are curricular (AI-free coursework, transparency, AI-free spaces); it never raises the continuation question."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-rochester-2024-c54c80",
  "institution": "University of Rochester",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "UR researchers can consult legal services, chief security officers, etc. to review a tool supplier's terms of use, privacy policy, and other tool documentation before using any system to process sensitive or proprietary information in research",
  "page": "p.5 (pdf_5), closing guidance",
  "reason": "Routes review to a named list of existing offices (URMC Office of Integrity and Compliance, Office of Counsel, OHSP, OVPR) and points readers to the pre-existing AI Council and RPC; proposes nothing new, refuses nothing."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "wayne-state-university-2026-9fb538",
  "institution": "Wayne State University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "AIC recommended that the Senate’s Policy Committee, CIC, and FAC may want to consider a similar presentation.",
  "page": "p.5, item 7",
  "reason": "An ad hoc Senate subcommittee's activity report that hands every item to existing Senate standing committees (Policy, CIC, FAC, GEOC, Research, AI Academic Software Review); borderline flag - item 14 lists the subcommittee's own agenda 'in the next academic year,' which anticipates its continuation without asking for permanent status."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "wayne-state-university-2026-b05f1b",
  "institution": "Wayne State University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "The policy should include a statement regarding consultation with a student’s advisor, program director, and/or departmental graduate committee for specific uses of AI or exceptions to the unit’s AI policies.",
  "page": "p.1, Section A.7",
  "reason": "Model guidance that assigns policy drafting and annual review to existing graduate programs, departmental graduate committees and Student Disability Services; no central body proposed or refused."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "yale-university-2024-d2f561",
  "institution": "Yale University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "We recommend that, during the summer of 2024, the university develop a detailed plan for institutional investment that can allow the implementation of these priorities.",
  "page": "p.7, Conclusion",
  "reason": "The task force asks for investments (compute, tools, training, events, policy refinement) and hands implementation planning to the administration and the schools; borderline flag - it recommends 'new AI-focused research-scientist positions, possibly through the Yale Center for Research Computing,' which is staffing inside an existing center, not a governance body."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "california-state-university-sacr-2026-45d363",
  "institution": "California State University, Sacramento",
  "verdict": "declines",
  "passage": "We recommend that we not continue the AI Steering Committee in its original campuswide form.",
  "page": "p.6, Section 6, Recommended Next Phase",
  "reason": "Confirmed in the document text: the report sunsets the standing committee ('sunset the standing committee structure,' p.7, Conclusion) and substitutes 'Provost/CIO light-touch coordination... rather than a standing large committee'; the only new body it names is a College of Business task force, not a university one."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-northern-colorado-2025-2603d5",
  "institution": "University of Northern Colorado",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Existing policies identified by the task force should be reviewed and revised by the appropriate university department(s) and/or governing group(s) by the end of fiscal year 2026.",
  "page": "p.6, Complete Recommendations, Policy Gaps, item 9",
  "reason": "Policy work routed to existing departments and governance groups; the report shows it knows how to refuse in words ('We DO NOT recommend developing a single overarching generative AI policy,' item 8) and never applies that language to a standing body. Borderline flag - it recommends establishing faculty and staff communities of practice and expanding CETL offerings, which are programs rather than governance machinery."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "wake-forest-university-2025-689407",
  "institution": "Wake Forest University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "We recommend that academic units plan for an ongoing way to continue to address GAI impacts together, select individual topics to review over time, and give progress updates in annual reports.",
  "page": "HTML, GAI Discussion Framework Topics for Academic Units",
  "reason": "The working group's final report pushes continuing work down to schools, departments and programs using the existing annual-report cycle, and asks the Provost and Deans to support it; no central body proposed and none declined."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "boise-state-university-2026-70fe5a",
  "institution": "Boise State University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Departments and relevant units should periodically review AI-assisted grading practices to assess alignment with rubric criteria, identify override patterns, and monitor potential bias. Ongoing evaluation is necessary as AI systems evolve.",
  "page": "html",
  "reason": "Continuing work routed to existing units (departments, OIT review, academic support, or the CIO office); no continuing body proposed and none refused. Coded from the extraction at v1.5."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "boise-state-university-2026-2b9131",
  "institution": "Boise State University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "All findings or allegations of academic misconduct should be reported to the Dean of Students to ensure consistent application of policy, due process, and students’ right to appeal. Centralized reporting also enables early, coordinated intervention when patterns of concern emerge",
  "page": "html",
  "reason": "Continuing work routed to existing units (departments, OIT review, academic support, or the CIO office); no continuing body proposed and none refused. Coded from the extraction at v1.5."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "boise-state-university-2026-cd540b",
  "institution": "Boise State University",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "Systems marketed as AI tutors must undergo pedagogical and ethical review prior to adoption, with instructors and tutors guiding the review process.",
  "page": "html",
  "reason": "Continuing work routed to existing units (departments, OIT review, academic support, or the CIO office); no continuing body proposed and none refused. Coded from the extraction at v1.5."
 },
 {
  "doc_id": "university-of-illinois-urbana-ch-2024-07773b",
  "institution": "University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign",
  "verdict": "defers",
  "passage": "The Generative AI Solutions Hub recommends the following actions take place to develop proof-of-concept solutions for certain high-priority use cases.",
  "page": "13",
  "reason": "Continuing work routed to existing units (departments, OIT review, academic support, or the CIO office); no continuing body proposed and none refused. Coded from the extraction at v1.5."
 }
]